DATA GOVERNANCE

Your organization, analyzed.
Your next actions, prioritized.

Diakon analyzes your organization's data governance and prioritizes what to do next — an objective, auditable and reproducible assessment.

How it works

Submit your document

Policy documents, manuals, meeting minutes — any material that reflects how your organization thinks about and practices data governance.

  • PDF, DOCX, TXT — up to 20 MB
  • Multiple documents per assessment
  • No complex setup

Diakon analyzes

It examines each passage against the standard of the discipline — no bias, no opinion, none of the friction of traditional consulting.

  • Every area of data management assessed
  • Same criteria across the whole organization
  • Auditable and reproducible

You get recommendations

What matters is knowing what to do tomorrow. Each recommendation comes with a priority and its corresponding area.

  • Recommendations prioritized by impact
  • Directly linked to each assessed area
  • PDF export to share
What you get

A clear index and prioritized actions

↓ Click an action to see the full breakdown

0Diakon Score
High
Define access controls by data typeData Security

Your documentation describes access granted by system — whoever enters a system sees every record in it. Sensitive and operational data currently get the same protection.

"Access to systems is controlled by individual logins and passwords." — passage from your document
  • Classify data by sensitivity before any technical change
  • Grant access by data type, not by whole system
  • Log and periodically review who accesses what
Data SecurityImpact: exposure of sensitive data
High
Establish formal quality metricsData Quality

The document acknowledges the problems — duplicate records, incomplete addresses — but doesn't define how to measure them. Without measurement, correction only happens when someone complains.

"Error correction happens reactively, when a problem is reported by operations."
  • Start with the records that already cause known rework
  • Set numeric completeness targets for critical fields
  • Establish a measurement cadence that fits the team
Data QualityImpact: operational rework
Medium
Publish a corporate business glossaryMetadata

Terms like "active customer" and "on-time delivery" are interpreted differently by different areas — and that's exactly what produces divergent management reports about the same month.

  • Prioritize the terms that appear most in board reports
  • Assign who validates each definition per domain
  • Version definitions to track changes in criteria
MetadataImpact: divergence between reports
Low
Formalize a data retention policyLifecycle

Data is kept indefinitely, except for tax obligations. Without a disposal rule, liability grows silently — in storage cost and regulatory risk.

  • Map the data categories that currently have no defined timeframe
  • Align timeframes with the legal obligations you already meet
  • Define the disposal procedure, not just the timeframe
LifecycleImpact: cost and regulatory risk
Diagnosis by area

Where the risks are — and where to start

↓ Click an area to see the full diagnosis

⚠ PRIORITY RISKhigh relevance · low adherence
✓ STRONG AREAhigh relevance · high adherence
◐ MONITORlow relevance · low adherence
↑ EFFORTlow relevance · high adherence
RELEVANCE →ADHERENCE →
Gov
Qua
Sec
Arc
Lif
Met
Sto
Click an area of the matrix
to see the full diagnosis
Why Diakon

Principles that guide every assessment

↓ Click a principle to learn the idea behind it

Completeness

No one forgotten in the records. Diakon checks whether your documentation covers every area — with no invisible gaps.

learn more

The name Diakon comes from a concrete story: people who needed care but weren't in the records. The first deacons were appointed so that no one would remain invisible.

  • Every area of data management enters the analysis
  • What is absent is flagged as clearly as what exists
  • Invisible gaps are the ones that cost the most later

Reliability

Worthy of a decision. The assessment follows a consistent, auditable standard — not a consultant's guesswork.

learn more

A diagnosis is only useful if you can take it to the board and defend it. Every conclusion is anchored in a passage of your own document — nothing comes from nowhere.

  • The same document assessed twice yields the same result
  • Identical criteria across the organization, no exceptions
  • You can verify the origin of every finding

Fairness

The people behind the data deserve care. The assessment is impartial and reproducible — not an arbitrary "pass."

learn more

Behind every record there is a person — a customer, a patient, an employee. Data governance is, above all, care for those who depend on these records.

  • No arbitrary "pass" and no bias toward whoever hired it
  • The result doesn't change depending on who requested the assessment

Ready to know where your organization stands?

Book a no-commitment conversation.

Book a conversation